DeepSeek Open Source AI: How Enterprises Can Leverage Cost Savings and Data Control

In early 2025, Chinese AI startup DeepSeek shook the entire AI industry with its flagship DeepSeek-R1 model. This model, which demonstrates capabilities comparable to top competitors in reasoning and mathematics, was released under the extremely permissive MIT open-source license and surpassed ChatGPT to become the most downloaded free app on the US App Store within a month of release. This open-source AI wave is reshaping the rules of enterprise AI, and this article provides an in-depth analysis of its implications and opportunities for SMEs.

Why Did DeepSeek Generate Such Buzz?

Reddit Community Reaction

DeepSeek's release sparked extensive discussion on Reddit. According to academic research, the r/deepseek subreddit accumulated 7,400 posts and 39,249 comments over five months. Discussion topics covered:

• Open-source AI model architecture
• Performance comparisons with ChatGPT
• Device compatibility issues
• Censorship concerns
• Commercial application possibilities

The community became a hybrid space for real-time DeepSeek evaluation—simultaneously serving as a help forum, technical feedback channel, and venue for debating the future of open-source AI.

Industry Giant Responses

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman admitted OpenAI has been "on the wrong side of history" regarding open-source AI and is reconsidering its strategy. He acknowledged DeepSeek's capabilities and predicted OpenAI's future dominance won't be as strong as before.

This marks a significant shift in the AI industry landscape—open-source models are no longer experimental but genuinely competitive enterprise-grade options.

Open Source vs Closed Source AI: Striking Cost Differences

API Usage Cost Comparison

The most direct impact is on costs. Here's a real price comparison:

Model	Output Token Cost (per million)	Relative Cost
OpenAI o1	$60	100%
DeepSeek R1 (via Together AI)	$7	11.7%

This means using DeepSeek costs approximately one-tenth of OpenAI. For enterprises with heavy AI usage, this represents significant savings.

Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Analysis

Cost isn't just API call fees. A complete TCO assessment should consider:

Cost Item	Closed Source	Open Source
API/License Fees	High and ongoing	Low or free
Infrastructure	Vendor hosted	Self-hosted or rented
Technical Talent	Lower requirements	Needs AI/ML expertise
Customization	Limited	Full freedom
Data Control	Limited	Full control
Vendor Dependency	High	Low

For SMEs, the choice depends on:

• Usage volume
• Technical team capabilities
• Data sensitivity
• Degree of customization needs

Five Enterprise Advantages of Open Source AI

1. Cost Control and Predictability

Open-source models allow enterprises to deploy on their own infrastructure, converting variable costs (API calls) to fixed costs (server computing). For high-usage enterprises, this can bring significant savings.

2. Data Sovereignty and Privacy

Many enterprises have concerns about sending sensitive data to third-party AI services. Open-source models can be deployed internally or on private clouds, with data never leaving their control. This is especially important for highly regulated industries like finance, healthcare, and legal.

3. Customization Freedom

Open-source models can be:

• Fine-tuned for specific domains
• Integrated with proprietary knowledge bases
• Adjusted for model behavior and output style
• Deeply integrated with existing systems

This flexibility is difficult for closed-source APIs to provide.

4. Reduced Vendor Lock-in Risk

Risks of depending on a single AI vendor include:

• Price increases
• Terms of service changes
• Service interruptions
• Feature changes

Open-source models provide more choices and negotiating leverage.

5. Economics of Multi-Model Workflows

Modern AI applications often require chaining multiple models. Building complex workflows with closed-source APIs can quickly accumulate costs, while open-source models provide more economical options.

Challenges of Enterprise Open Source AI Adoption

Challenge 1: Security Concerns

Research from the University of Pennsylvania and Cisco found that DeepSeek failed all 50 common jailbreaking technique tests. This means enterprises rushing to adopt may unwittingly introduce security vulnerabilities.

Recommendations:

• Conduct independent security assessments
• Establish input/output filtering mechanisms
• Limit model access permissions
• Continuously monitor for anomalous behavior

Challenge 2: Business Model Sustainability

The commercialization path for open-source models remains unclear. As a Gartner analyst noted: "Simply offering an open-source model itself is not a long-term viable commercial strategy." Vendors need to generate revenue through enterprise platforms or vertical applications.

Recommendations:

• Evaluate vendor long-term development strategies
• Establish backup plans
• Maintain complete technical documentation

Challenge 3: Technical Barriers

Deploying and operating open-source AI models requires:

• AI/ML expertise
• Infrastructure management capabilities
• Ongoing update and optimization abilities

For SMEs lacking technical teams, this can be a significant barrier.

Recommendations:

• Consider managed open-source solutions (e.g., Together AI, Replicate)
• Seek professional consulting assistance
• Start with simple applications to build experience

Challenge 4: Censorship and Compliance

As a model developed in China, DeepSeek has censorship mechanisms for certain discussion topics. This may affect suitability for specific use cases and raises compliance concerns about data handling.

Recommendations:

• Understand model limitations and biases
• Evaluate whether it meets business requirements
• Consider compliance requirements

Practical Recommendations for SMEs

Scenario 1: High-Volume Inference Needs

If your application requires extensive AI inference (e.g., customer service bots, content generation), open-source models may bring significant cost savings.

Recommended Path:

1. Try DeepSeek using managed services like Together AI
2. Compare results with existing closed-source solutions
3. If results are comparable, calculate cost savings
4. Consider gradual migration

Scenario 2: Data-Sensitive Applications

If handling customer PII, financial data, or trade secrets, data sovereignty is the primary concern.

Recommended Path:

1. Evaluate private deployment feasibility
2. Consider private cloud or on-premises deployment options
3. Establish data isolation mechanisms
4. Conduct regular security reviews

Scenario 3: Vertical Domain Applications

If AI needs to deeply understand specific industry knowledge, customization is key.

Recommended Path:

1. Choose open-source models suitable for fine-tuning
2. Prepare high-quality domain data
3. Conduct model fine-tuning
4. Continuously optimize performance

Scenario 4: First-Time AI Exploration

If just starting to evaluate AI application possibilities:

Recommended Path:

1. Start with closed-source APIs (faster to start, less maintenance)
2. Validate application value and usage patterns
3. Evaluate open-source options as scale grows
4. Decide on migration based on cost-effectiveness

Hybrid Strategy: Balancing Benefits and Risks

The best strategy for most enterprises is hybrid usage:

Application Type	Recommended Approach
Core business, high sensitivity	Privately deployed open-source models
High volume, cost sensitive	Managed open-source services
Innovation experiments, rapid iteration	Closed-source APIs
High customization needs	Open-source models + fine-tuning
Complex integration requirements	Decide based on integration difficulty

FAQ

Q1: Is DeepSeek really better than ChatGPT?

For specific tasks (like reasoning and math), DeepSeek-R1 demonstrates capabilities comparable to GPT-4. But "better" depends on specific applications. We recommend testing based on actual use cases rather than relying solely on benchmark results.

Q2: Are there risks using Chinese-developed AI models?

There are some considerations: censorship mechanisms may affect certain outputs, data privacy policies require careful evaluation, and geopolitical factors may affect long-term availability. We recommend assessing whether these factors impact your specific applications.

Q3: Are open-source models really free?

The models themselves are free, but require computing resources to run. Options include: own hardware (high upfront investment, low marginal cost), cloud computing (pay-as-you-go), or managed services (simplified management, usage-based billing). Total cost depends on usage volume and deployment method.

Q4: My team has no AI experts—can we use open-source models?

Yes! Multiple options now lower technical barriers: managed API services (like Together AI), one-click deployment tools, and professional consulting assistance. However, for deep customization, building or bringing in AI talent is still recommended.

Q5: Should I completely switch from closed to open source?

Not necessarily. The best strategy is usually hybrid: choosing the most suitable approach based on different application needs. Completely switching to either camp may miss the advantages of the other.

Conclusion: Seize the Strategic Opportunity of Open Source AI

DeepSeek's rise represents a new era for open-source AI. For enterprises, this means more choices, lower costs, and greater control. But opportunities come with challenges—security, technical capabilities, and commercial sustainability all require careful evaluation.

The key isn't an either-or choice between "open source or closed source," but finding the most suitable combination strategy based on business needs, technical capabilities, and risk preferences.

ACTGSYS continuously monitors AI technology developments and provides practical AI implementation advice for SMEs. Whether you're evaluating open-source model feasibility or planning enterprise AI strategy, we can provide professional consulting and technical support.

Schedule a free consultation—let's discuss the AI strategy that's right for you!

Contact Us →